|
Report
to
Environmental Services Committee
and Council
7 October 2002
Submitted
by
Iola Price and Joanna Dean, Co-Chairs
Ottawa Forests Advisory Committee
Contact:
Robbie Tremblay, Advisory Committee Coordinator
580-2424 ext. 28135, rob.tremblay@ottawa.ca
|
Rapport
au
Comité des services de l’environnement et au Conseil
le 7 octobre 2002
Soumis
par
Iola Price et Joanna Dean, Co-présidentes
Comité consultatif sur les forêts d’Ottawa
Personne-ressource:
Robbie Tremblay, Coordonnateur de comité consultatif
580-2424 poste 28135, rob.tremblay@ottawa.ca
|
| Ref N°: ACS2002-CCV-OFO-0001 |
|
Ottawa
Forests Advisory Committee
2001/2002 Annual Report and
2003 Workplan
|
Comité
consultatif sur les forêts d’Ottawa
Rapport annuel de 2001/2002 et
Plan de travail 2003
|
REPORT
RECOMMENDATIONS
- That
the Environmental Services Committee recommend Council:
- receive
the 2001/2002 Annual Report of the Ottawa Forests Advisory
Committee, as detailed in Attachment 1; and
- approve
the objectives contained in the 2003 workplan, as detailed
in Attachment 2.
- That
the Environmental Services Committee approve the provision
of funds in the amount of $8,825 to implement the objectives
contained in the workplan, subject to any amendments to
the workplan approved by Council.
|
RECOMMANDATIONS
DU RAPPORT
- Que
le Comité des services de l’environnement recommande que
le Conseil :
- reçoive
le Rapport annuel de 2001-2002 du Comité consultatif
sur les forêts d’Ottawa, tel que décrit à la pièce jointe
no 1;
- approuve
les objectifs qui sont présentés dans le plan de travail
2003, tel que décrit à la pièce jointe no 2.
- Que
le Comité des services de l’environnement approuve la prestation
de capitaux au montant de 8825 $ pour mettre en œuvre les
objectifs présentés dans le plan de travail, selon les modifications
apportées au plan de travail et approuvées par le Conseil.
|
BACKGROUND
City
Council, March 28, 2001,
approved the creation of advisory committees, including the requirement
for each to complete a workplan outlining proposed projects and
activities for the upcoming year.
The workplan should identify each and every activity the
Committee plans to undertake in the upcoming year, whether they
have a budgetary impact or not.
The item should be identified, a brief description of the
project or activity should be noted, and the anticipated timing
of the item should be provided. The Committee Coordinator, Lead Department Representative
and Financial Services will assist in determining the estimated
budget associated with each activity.
In
addition, the Lead Department Representatives are to provide the
Committee with information on the departmental workplan and priorities,
where the workplans of the Committees tie into that workplan, and
where the Committee can assist the Department.
The Lead Department Representative will also advise on what
staff and/or financial resources are available as part of departmental
priorities.
During
the first year of advisory committee operation, the preparation
of the workplan was a confusing process.
Consequently, Council, on August
28, 2002, approved Advisory Committee Workplan Guidelines
and Workplan Funding Criteria to facilitate a smoother process this
year.
City
Council, during the 2002 budget deliberations, approved an annual
allocation of $150,000 to be divided among eligible advisory committees
for their annual workplan projects and activities. The funds are
to be allocated by the standing committee to which the advisory
committee reports at the time of workplan review and approval, and
then forwarded to Council for ratification.
ANALYSIS
The
mandate of the Ottawa Forests Advisory Committee (OFAC) is to provide
advice and guidance to Ottawa City Council, through the Environmental
Services Committee, which will help safeguard the environment of
the city through the use of trees and tree cover, and provide input
into tree and forest-related policies and budgets. The committee
also encourages and supports the promotion of public awareness of
the City's trees and forests and citizens' knowledge of the role
of trees in protecting and enhancing the quality of life.
Historically,
and most recently in Kanata, the process of building our city has
resulted in the destruction of forests and other significant natural
features. The rate of that loss appears to be increasing as we
rush to build new houses and commercial centres on the remaining
undeveloped land. In its comments to the City on the Ottawa 2020
process, OFAC urged the City to
"Make clear statements of intent regarding
its commitment to wise, sustainable land use and tree protection
through the development of goals and the effective inclusion of
principles in implementation documents. The intent of wise land
use policy must be understood and respected by all participants
if we are to move towards the goal of a sustainable future".
Trees
and forests provide many ecological, social, economic and aesthetic
benefits; a city with a health forest is a healthy city.
The features that draw people to our city and make it a wonderful
place to live are the abundance of natural features such as tree-lined
streets and forested areas in both the urban and rural areas. The great challenge for the City will be to
take the multiplicity of advice it receives and to translate that
into a cohesive Official Plan that will enhance our citys
future sustainability and liveability, and send a strong
message regarding the importance of trees and natural areas.
The
Ottawa Forests Advisory Committee will work to have its mandated
advice to Council on the importance of trees and forests (including
the importance that our citizens place on trees) lead to a new way
of thinking, planning and developing that will lead to the conservation
of one of our greatest natural assets our trees and forests.
In this, its second workplan, OFAC is taking steps to assist
the City in seeking out new approaches, which will meet the objectives
of reducing our consumption of land and natural resources and at
the same time, build our city.
CONSULTATION
Transportation, Utilities
and Public Works Department
The
Transportation Utilities and Public Works Department concurs with
the work plan objectives put forward by the Committee, and looks
forward to working closely with its members on a wide variety of
urban and rural forestry needs.
The work plan provides
for a balanced approach to Committee involvement in community consultation
and visioning, new Committee-driven initiatives and involvement
in priority issues the Department will be addressing over the next
year.
The
Department's proposed capital budget program does not provide funds
to support the committee's work plan items and any additional costs
associated with them.
Corporate
Services Department, Communications and Marketing
FINANCIAL
IMPLICATIONS
City Council in 2002 approved an annual allocation
of $150,000 to be divided among eligible advisory committees for
their annual workplan projects and activities.
The funds are to be allocated by the standing committee to
which the advisory committee reports at the time of workplan review
and approval, and then forwarded to Council for ratification.
Assuming that the 2003 budget allocation
for the Environmental Services Committee remains the same as in
2002, the ESC has $17,648 to be allocated among the advisory committees
reporting to it.
Financial
Services Unit, Corporate Services Department
The
proposed 2003 budget allocation for Advisory Committee Workplans
is subject to Council approval as part of the 2003 budget process.
Based on the relative merits of the workplans submitted by
the Advisory Committees, the responsible Standing Committee will
allocate the available funds. The proposed allocation of this funding to individual
Advisory Committees is scheduled to take place in mid-November 2002.
For
internal control purposes, all spending by Advisory Committees is
subject to the limitations established by City Council on March 27, 2002. These guidelines stipulate that the following
items will not be eligible for WorkPlan funding:
- requests
for hiring of consultants;
- travel
requests for Committee members;
- requests
for attendance at conferences by committee members;
- cash
advances for members;
- requests
for provision of meals for committee members; and
- requests to hire additional staff to support the Committees
work.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 2001/2002 Annual Report of the Ottawa Forests
Advisory Committee
Attachment 2 Proposed 2003 Workplan of the Ottawa Forests
Advisory Committee
Attachment 3 Terms of Reference of the Ottawa Forests Advisory
Committee
DISPOSITION
The Ottawa Forests Advisory Committee to carry out the objectives
and activities as set out in the workplan. Transportation, Utilities
and Public Works Department and Development Services Department
to consult the Advisory Committee as required.
Attachment 1
Ottawa Forests Advisory Committee Annual Report 2001/2002
INTRODUCTION
AND OVERVIEW
The first 10
months of OFAC's existence may justly be described as one of major
organizational progress and solid achievement despite much uncertainty,
growing pains and a major unexpected diversion.
OFAC has made
substantial contributions to city policy on trees and forests by
providing written submissions on:
- Preliminary
Drafts of the Ottawa Official Plan
- Interim Measures
to Control Tree Cutting
- Quarry Forest
- Rezoning
of Carp Ridge Natural Environment Area “A”
- Development
Proposals on Ogilvie Road, Walkley Road
- Ottawa Forests
Awareness Day
Members of
the committee participated in discussions toward:
- Woodland
Preservation Bylaw
- Woodland
Assessment Study
- Resolution
of the Kanata “tree massacre”
- Preparation
of a rare plant inventory of Torbolton Forest
- Management
of community forests
OFAC has also
established a City of Ottawa presence among forestry organizations
by organizing a symposium on the urban forest, “Urban Forests: Challenges
and Opportunities,” by participating in the Eastern Ontario Model
Forest, the national Urban Forest Conference, the Eastern Ontario
Urban Forest Network and National Forest Week, and the Kemptville
Winter Woodlot Conference, and by inviting speakers to monthly meetings.
OFAC has also increased public awareness of our urban and rural
forests through
- Website, www.ottawaforests.ca
- Pamphlet
- Newspaper articles
- Interviews on radio and television
- Public displays at local events and the Museum of Nature
- Public workshop to be held in October 2002
- Citizen presentations at monthly meetings.
These tasks were accomplished in the face of frequent personnel
changes, both internally and externally.
OFAC was established in October 2001 with 12 members. Two resigned
in May and five new members were appointed in August for a total
of 15 members plus two additional reserve members. At the first
meeting, Robin Higham was elected Chair and Joanna Dean Vice-chair.
Three months later, in January 2002, this structure was changed
to one of two Co-chairs, with Joanna Dean and Ronald Daigle occupying
the positions. Iola Price replaced Ronald Daigle as Co-chair in
August 2002. OFAC's primary liaison with City staff and the Council
is through the Committee Coordinator. Over the period October 2001
to September 2002, OFAC has had six Coordinators, culminating with
the appointment of Robbie Tremblay in June.
OFAC's work was interrupted in mid June, when members were informed
of a staff proposal to amalgamate the OFAC with the Environmental
Advisory Committee. The need to address this issue caused a diversion
in time and energy from productive work. By decision of Council
on August 28, 2002 this issue has been deferred to the end of the
current term of Council, at which time there will be a full review
of all advisory committees.
OFAC first met on October 28, 2001, and was mandated to prepare
its first work plan before the end of November. This deadline, and
the lack of guidelines as to budget, allowable expenditures and
activities, made planning difficult. A subcommittee was formed and
proposed a work plan based on its mandate:
"The mandate of the Ottawa Forests Advisory Committee
is to provide advice and guidance to Ottawa City Council, through
the Environmental Services Committee, which will help safeguard
the environment of the City through the use of trees and tree cover,
and provide input into tree and forest management related policies
and budgets. The Committee will also encourage and support promotion
of public awareness of the Citys trees and forests and citizen's
knowledge of the role of trees in protecting and enhancing quality
of life."
A budget of $8,900 was proposed. (Staff later added additional
funding for simultaneous translation services for a public forum.
This addition, which increased the final proposed budget to $15,800,
was removed by OFAC when we were informed of alternate methods for
delivery of a bilingual public forum.) OFAC discussed and approved
its workplan on November 19, 2001.
As the work
plan states
"In
this first year of its existence the OFAC considers it should concentrate
on a few basic objectives. If these can be achieved they will be
the advisory committee's most useful initial contributions to Council
and citizens of Ottawa in the quest for adequate and appropriate
forests and tree cover throughout the new City in the coming years.
The work plan for 2002 therefore focuses largely on broad objectives
such as providing advice, acting as a sounding board, and advocating
for the restoration, conservation and sustainable management of
Ottawa's forests. These objectives are, in turn, aimed at the following
long-term goals:
- A comprehensive Ottawa Forests Plan;
- A tree and vegetative cover for the city which is appropriate
in species mix and varied according to location;
- A dynamic and effective partnership among individuals, community
groups, organizations and agencies in the development and conservation
of Ottawa forests and tree cover."
On January
22, 2002, OFAC presented its proposed work plan and budget to the
Environmental Services Committee (ESC), which approved the work
plan in principle but deferred funding until the 2002 City budget
deliberations. In March 2002, City Council approved an amount of
$150,000 to be divided among all the advisory committees; on April
23, 2002, the ESC allocated OFAC $8,823 to carry out its activities.
OFACs fiscal year effectively started on that day.
WORK PLAN ACTIVITIES
1.0 Ottawa Forest Plan
1.1 Inventories
- Discussions with University of Toronto and University of Guelph
professional forestry staff on matters relating to optimal tree
cover and best practices for inventories of urban and rural
tree cover.
- Pilot evaluation of a rapid street tree inventory method by
OFAC members and a professional forester.
- Discussions with the Ottawa Girl Guides on their past activities
conducting tree inventories.
1.2 Pilot Projects
- In connection with the assessment of the possibilities and
costs of developing comprehensive plans, members investigated
the prospects for community support through consultation on
a pilot project.
1.3 Network with Related Groups
- Participation in the formation and development of the Eastern
Ontario Urban Forest Network. OFAC attended three meetings in
Kemptville to establish operating procedures and to exchange
information and expertise with representatives from various
municipalities including Brockville, Cornwall, Gananoque and
Perth.
- Participation in ongoing discussions concerning the development
of generic information themes and materials for use by the Eastern
Ontario Model Forest. The Model Forests’ renewed mandate now
includes a requirement to focus on urban forest issues. The
OFAC has been invited to join the network's steering group.
- Participation in a working group to identify and select agenda
topics for the 5th Canadian Urban Forest Conference to be held
in Markham, Ontario October 7 - 9. Ottawa's City Forester will
be one of the presenters at this conference and one member of
the OFAC has volunteered to attend this major event and deliver
a report to the committee on his return.
- Attendance at and participation in Kanata Community Association
meetings held to discuss the aftermath of the “tree massacre.”
Presentations by the following have been made at OFAC meetings:
- Ottawa-Carleton Wildlife Centre
- Canadian Forestry Association
- Eastern Canada Society of Nut Growers
- Ruffed Grouse Society
- Greenspace Alliance
- Rideau Valley Conservation Authority
2.0 The Official Plan
2.1 Input to the Official Plan
Recommendations
- Written submission: Comments and Recommendations on Ottawa
2020:Charting A Course, February 25, 2002.
- Participation in Ottawa 2020 Open Houses.
- Written submission and presentation to the Committee-of-the-Whole
in response to the release of Charting a Course: The Next Step,
June 2002.
2.2 Tree Cover
- Provision of information about the percent tree cover in Ottawa
to Councillor Wendy Stewart
- Provision of reference material to Ottawa 2020 staff on benchmarks
for tree cover and measurement of forest management success
at request of Councillor Jacques Legendre
2.3 Partners Forum
- OFAC’s first significant public event, held in May 2002 was
organized in collaboration with the Canadian Institute of Forestry
(Ottawa Valley Section) and with financial assistance from ScotiaMcleod
Inc. The symposium – "Urban Forests: Challenges and Opportunities"
was designed to permit 60 expert and engaged individuals from
Council, City Staff and the environmental and land development
communities to engage in knowledgeable discussion of issues
associated with environmental (particularly forest) protection
in a period of urban growth. Andrew Kenney, professor of urban
and community forestry at the University of Toronto provided
the keynote address after which differing perspectives on the
symposium's theme were provided by a panel of experts in several
fields. There then followed a lively and well-informed exchange
of views and comments from the audience.
3.0 Public Outreach
OFAC’s mandate also includes the requirements to provide “a forum
for citizens interested in trees and tree cover to raise issues
and concerns.” In this regard, OFAC received presentations at its
meetings from the following:
- Private citizen concerned about the removal of mature trees
prior to the renovation of a private house in residential downtown
Ottawa.
- Private citizen with a report on the microburst that destroyed
many trees in Fallowfield Village.
- Private citizens from Perez Crescent concerned about the loss
of tree cover on the proposed development at 1298 Ogilvie Road
[City File No. OCP 2002-0012; OZP 2002-055, OSP 2002-0105].
ADVICE TO COUNCIL
OFAC also participated
in a broad range of other activities that could not be anticipated
at the time the work plan was created.
Most fall under that part of the OFAC mandate to provide
advice and guidance to Council on safeguarding the environment of
the City through the use of trees and tree cover and to provide
input into tree and forest management related policies and budgets.
Kanata Tree “Massacre” and ensuing Tree Preservation Bylaw
- Participation in Kanata Community Association meetings held
to discuss the aftermath of the “tree massacre”.
- Motion for Council to support a staff inquiry into the creation
of a tree cutting by-law that recognizes a need for distinction
between the urban and rural context.
- Attendance at the Kanata Recreational Master Plan meeting.
- Written submission on the staff report, Interim Measures to
Control Tree Cutting and to Develop a Trees Bylaw.
- OFAC representation on the working committee to develop the
new tree bylaw (Woodland Preservation Bylaw) by request of the
Planning and Development staff
Harmonization of Service Standards
- Participation in Open Houses (phases 1 and 2) on the Harmonization
of Service Standards, including criteria for services that touch
on tree and forest issues.
Assessment of Urban Woodlands
- Representation on the steering committee that will re-evaluate
criteria for the assessment of urban woodlands, by request of
Planning and Development staff.
Budget 2002
- Input to the 2002 City budget discussions.
Motion for Council
- Support of the Eastern Ontario Model Forest’s Phase III proposal
to the Canadian Forest Service.
Planning and Development Proposals
- Carp Ridge Rezoning: Written submission; Comment on Proposed
Rezoning of Carp Ridge Natural Environment Area ‘A’ in the South
March Community.
- Quarry Forest: OFAC review of the Quarry Forest Report, referred
by Councillor Janet Stavinga; Memorandum and talking points presented
to Council on the Quarry Forest Report. [City File No. ASC 2002-DEV-APR-0127
06T 99029 Block J]
- 1298 Ogilvie Road: Investigation and report on loss of tree
cover associated with a proposed development at 1298 Ogilvie Road.
[City File No. OCP 2002-0012; OZP 2002-055, OSP 2002-0105]
- Walkley Road: Comments on proposal for site on Walkley Road.
[City File No. OZP 2002-0113]
- Constance Creek: Investigation of tree loss caused by a development
in Constance Creek and its possible violation of the City’s planning
process. [City File No. OLV 2002-0024 West Carleton].
- Frieman Woods: Comments on ways to preserve trees and enhance
tree cover input to Environmental Advisory Committee report. [City
File No. OSP 2002-0021, OVL 2002-004, OSP 2002-0028].
Community Forests
- Torbolton Forest: preparation of material for a rare plant inventory.
- Marlborough Forest: advice to City staff in regard to a request
from a commercial enterprise to continue using the forest for
paintball games.
- OFAC member liaison to staff for Torbolton and Marlborough Community
Forests.
Attachment
2
Ottawa Forests
Advisory Committee
Workplan 2002/2003
INTRODUCTION
In November 2001, the
OFAC submitted its workplan for the year 2001-2002.
The Environmental Services Committee approved it in January
2002, and allocated a budget of $8,823 for its implementation in
April 2002. The 2001-2002 workplan identified three long-term
goals:
- A comprehensive Ottawa Forests Plan
- Tree and vegetative cover for the city that is appropriate in
species mix and varied according to location and
- Dynamic and effective partnerships for the development and conservation
of Ottawa forests and tree cover.
In 2002-2003 OFAC will continue to work toward these goals. OFAC's
priority is to provide the policy advice for the development of the
Forests Master Plan. In the coming year we will continue to work towards
this end by advising on the Official Plan, on the creation of tree
and forest inventories, on policy documents such as best practices
lists and a master list of native species, on the management of urban
and community forests, and on the writing of new bylaws such as the
woodlands preservation bylaw.
Equally
important are OFAC's goals and objectives related to professional
networks and citizen outreach. OFAC
will offer its services as facilitator working with partners
(and the city staff as appropriate) to organize workshops and forum,
develop pilot projects, and use media and the Web to involve citizens
in the preservation and improvement of our urban and rural forests.
Using
the Ottawa Forests Master Plan as the focus, we have divided our
activities into four themes:
- Ottawa Forests Master Plan (and associated Official Plan)
- Inventory (Resource Base)
- Management Prescriptions
- Tools for Implementation.
Appendix
1 offers specific details in regard to milestones, deliverables
and financial resources. It also shows how any specific workplan item
may be linked to others in the plan. OFAC respectfully requests a budgetary allotment of $8,825
for these activities.
Appendix
2 represents a model of how OFAC's workplan may be conceptually organized
to continue its work toward achieving its long term goals and objectives.
Appendix 1: Milestones, deliverables, and costs
| Ottawa Forests
Master Plan |
|
Policy
analysis and development leading to a Forests Master Plan
(that is supported by sufficient financial and staff resources)
that will provide the appropriate level of protection and
management for the trees and forests of Ottawa. The plan will provide the guidance on where
trees should be planted, how existing trees and forests should
be managed and will include stewardship of the currently-growing
trees and forests of Ottawa. It will encourage planting of new trees in
downtown areas where even one tree makes a significant difference
and appropriate management and stewardship of woodlots and
forests in Ottawa. The Plan also includes developing advice in
regard to appropriate forest cover for Ottawa.
|
| A.
Ottawa Forests Master Plan and the Official Plan |
|
Activity name:
|
A1 Official Plan Input I Principles and Policies
|
|
Related activities:
|
A.2, A3, C1, C3, D1
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Timely, written submissions
in accordance with timelines and opportunities provided for
public consultation in the Ottawa 2020 process
|
|
Time estimate:
|
Ongoing until Official Plan approved by Ontario Municipal
Board
|
|
Milestones:
|
Ottawa 2020 dates as set by City staff
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
$300
|
| |
|
Activity name:
|
A2 Official Plan Input II Implementation Review |
|
Related activities:
|
A1, A3, C3. D4
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Timely review of written documents and implementation
activities.
|
|
Time estimate:
|
Ongoing for life of committee; Quarterly reporting
at OFAC meetings.
|
|
Milestones:
|
Quarterly reporting -- see Official Plan and Ottawa
2020 documentation.
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
Nil
|
| |
|
Activity name:
|
A 3 Zoning/OP Amendments; Review development proposals
|
|
Related activities:
|
A1, A2, D1
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Timely review of proposals submitted to city for
zoning or Official Plan (including Secondary Plans) amendments
that have potential for impact on trees or forests;
Written reports for the Environmental Services Committee
|
|
Time estimate:
|
Ongoing; Report at each meeting.
|
|
Milestones:
|
Timely (within government-set timelines) comments,
approved by OFAC as a whole and forwarded to staff, standing
committee as necessary); Develop and apply our criteria for
what constitutes a good landscape/tree preservation plan as
a guideline for our assessment of a development plan/proposal;
Written and oral reports on review of development
proposals within the time frame mandated by the City.
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
Nil
|
| B:Inventory
(Resource Base) |
|
Activity name:
|
B1 Inventories 1
Street Trees
|
|
Related activities:
|
A1, C2, C3, D3
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Advice to City staff on planning for inventories
(harmonise the urban tree inventory); Support city staff in
efforts to develop a Forest Management Plan;
Heritage Tree criteria based on existing drafts (including
criteria from other municipalities), Nomination guidelines
and publicity announcement for media release; Draft certificate
for OFAC review, Approval from Environmental Services Committee
for program to proceed;
City inventory of Heritage trees and woodlots (if
proposal approved)
|
|
Time estimate:
|
18 months for heritage trees; 12 months for review
of existing municipal criteria for heritage woodlots.
|
|
Milestones:
|
Draft criteria for Heritage Trees by January 2003,
Nomination guidelines and draft certificate March 2003, Call
for nomination of trees April 2003, Review of submissions
June-August 2003; Selection December 2003; Announcement at
2003 Fall Forum with presentation of certificates by Mayor
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
$150
|
| |
|
Activity name:
|
B 2 Inventories - II Forest Cover |
|
Related activities:
|
A2, C2, C3, D3
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Review of the forest cover data in Ottawa (what exists
and where); Understanding of split between urban and rural
forest type and cover; review of other municipalities data
and success, Draft guidelines for the kind of forest cover
OFAC wants for Ottawa
|
|
Time estimate:
|
Long term; Ongoing
|
|
Milestones:
|
Meeting with city staff on November 2002 to review
scope of existing inventories and scope of work to fill in
the gaps; Report in December 2002; Collation of data on other
city inventories by March 2003.
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
Nil
|
| |
|
Activity name:
|
B3 Volunteer Street Trees Inventories
Ward Pilot
|
|
Related activities:
|
B1, D4, D7
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Involvement of neighbourhoods in conducting inventories
of trees on their street in a manner that provides useful
data for city forest staff;
Identification and Inventories of significant woodlots
(public and private).
|
|
Time estimate:
|
Medium and long term.
|
|
Milestones:
|
Identify two neighbourhoods with community groups for
an inventory November 2002; Test methodology November 2002;
Report to OFAC on feasibility of expansion of pilot February
2003.
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
$400
|
|
C: Management Prescriptions
|
|
Activity name:
|
C1 Best
Practices List
|
|
Related activities:
|
C2, D6, D8, D9
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Criteria for developers and planners to incorporate
trees into development proposals, possibly including the following:
- A checklist of information with appropriate accompanying data to encourage appropriate development
- Models from other locations
- Explore the need to develop a policy or a bylaw that inhibits or prohibits development if the land was clear-cut in the past 5-10 years
- Research on ways other municipalities have addressed the issue of clear cutting development lands
- References, brochures, links to websites
|
|
Time estimate:
|
Medium term
|
|
Milestones:
|
Quarterly reports 2002 and 2003
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
$400
|
| |
|
Activity name:
|
C2 Master List of Native Species
|
|
Related activities:
|
A2,
A3, C1, D2, D5, D6, D7
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Printed list or brochure, distributed widely to the
public;
Advice
via city hotlines on appropriate tree species to homeowners
that are suitable for use in public and private planting;
Provision of a list for City staff to use to review
acceptability of landscape plans for proposed developments
and to select trees for planting;
Discussion with tree nurseries about long term supply
of native (it is understood that there are places where salt-tolerant
non-native species are the only viable alternative and that
contracts with nurseries for the purchase of native species
will take some considerable lead time to implement).
|
|
Time estimate:
|
12
months
|
|
Milestones:
|
Draft list November 2002; consultation with selected
local nurseries January 2003 draft brochure March 2003; translation,
design, final brochure June 2003.
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
$450
|
| |
|
Activity name:
|
C3 Urban Woodland
Assessment
|
|
Related activities:
|
A1, B2, D3, D6
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Policy advice to city staff via a seat on the Management
Committee for this staff-led evaluation of natural sites;
Timely review by OFAC of documents produced by city
staff with appropriate comment.
|
|
Time estimate:
|
To be determined during first meeting called by City
staff
|
|
Milestones:
|
To be determined during first meeting called by City
staff
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
Nil
|
| D:
Tools for Implementation |
|
Activity name:
|
D1 Public Forum and Survey (carryover from 2001-02) |
|
Related activities:
|
D4,
D5, D8, D9
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Increased awareness (advocacy) by forum attendees;
Survey of attendee's opinion (shifts in awareness
regarding the Official Plan).
Follow up telephone survey of selected participants
in 6 months;
Input of Forum public opinion directly to City staff
working on the Official Plan and into OFAC comments of Official
Plan documents;
Updated concerned citizen mailing list.
|
|
Time estimate:
|
TBD on basis of 2002 Forum
|
|
Milestones:
|
2002 Follow up survey April 2003; Forum (2003); Report
November 2003.
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
$3525
|
| |
|
Activity name:
|
D2 Bylaws and Harmonisation of Service Standards
|
|
Related activities:
|
A2, A3, C1, D5
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Participation on management committees to draft Woodland
Preservation bylaw and others as opportunity arises and review of need for an interim tree-cutting bylaw.
Review of draft harmonisation standards October-November
2002, Report to OFAC November 2002, Report to Environmental
Services Committee December 2002.
|
|
Time estimate:
|
Ongoing/multi-year.
|
|
Milestones:
|
Report on bylaw development as committee meets; quarterly
report on harmonisation
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
Nil
|
| |
|
Activity name:
|
D3 Community Forest Management Plans
|
|
Related activities:
|
B1, B2, C1, C2, C3, D1, D5
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Proposal to support development of Community Forest
Management Plans; Review and provision of policy advice on
drafts of Forest Management Plans;
Advice to City Staff, Standing Committee and Council
on Community Forest issues; (including practical local input
on community wishes) on management of forests such as the
Rare Plant Study in Torbolton Forest).
|
|
Time estimate:
|
Ongoing.
|
|
Milestones:
|
Drafts of Cumberland plan to review when produced
by city staff; quarterly report on implementation of Marlborough
and Torbolton plans.
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
Nil
|
| |
|
Activity name:
|
D4 Pilot Planting Projects
|
|
Related activities:
|
C1,
C2, D3, D5, D6
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Design and implement a pilot project in collaboration
with a community group; Trees planted come from the OFAC list;
Trees for new and replacement plantings supplied by City (included
in other planting schemes); Circular metal tree guards (supplied
by city with contributions from community associations).
|
|
Time estimate:
|
Ongoing.
|
|
Milestones:
|
Semi-annual report on progress to find community
partners, Design appropriate plan and implement it; OFAC input
into city tree planting program.
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
For tree guards; labour supplied by community groups
as appropriate; $250
|
| |
|
Activity name:
|
D 5 Public Information (including the OFAC Website)
|
|
Related activities:
|
C1, C2, C3, D1, D4, D6, D7
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Distribution of brochure on OFAC and the benefits
of the urban forest.
Launch of OFAC website: www.ottawaforests.ca
Regular posting of items related to Ottawa trees and forests and tracking
of website use.
Publication of articles on trees and forests in community
newspapers.
Contacts with local media and publicity for OFAC
public events.
|
|
Time estimate:
|
Ongoing
|
|
Milestones:
|
Website launch and distribution of brochures and
articles for newspapers.
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
$1750
|
| |
|
Activity name:
|
D6 Professional Network
|
|
Related activities:
|
C1,
D1, D3, D4
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Database of organisations and individuals interested/involved
in forestry in Ottawa; held on city computer but
with OFAC access; Data input by city staff;
Attendance at Environmental Advisory Committee meetings
as OFAC liaison and monthly reporting to OFAC;
Report on OFAC members interaction with partner
groups (e.g. Canadian Institute of Forestry Ottawa Valley chapter), Eastern Ontario Model Forest, Greenspace Alliance).
|
|
Time estimate:
|
Ongoing; monthly meetings of related groups.
|
|
Milestones:
|
Report to OFAC after each meeting.
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
Nil
|
| |
|
Activity name:
|
D7 Special
Events
|
|
Related activities:
|
B1, B2, C2, D4, D5, D6
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Purchase of modular display unit and development
of suitable display material; Display of OFAC material at selected events such
as Kemptville Winter Woodlot Conference, public events at
which the Official Plan is discussed; Earth Day.
|
|
Time estimate:
|
Ongoing.
|
|
Milestones:
|
Report after each event.
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
$1550
|
| |
|
Activity name:
|
D8 Review Hydro Ottawa and Bell Canada Tree Trimming Guidelines and Practices
|
|
Related activities:
|
C1,
D2, D3, D9
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Review of documents produced by these two organizations and comment on them; Adoption of better (tree-friendly) practices by
them; On-site inspections show that they are following the
guidelines.
|
|
Time estimate:
|
Long term.
|
|
Milestones:
|
Obtain copies of past and current guidelines March
2003; Prepare a report for OFAC May 2003; Forward recommendations
to city staff July 2003
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
Nil
|
| |
|
Activity name:
|
D 9 Investigate
Feasibility of Burying Utility Lines
|
|
Related activities:
|
C1, D8
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Develop a document for determination of annual tree
trimming costs (e.g. but not limited to costs to clean up
after wind blowdowns, damage costs to wires from fallen trees,
repair of rodent chewing damage); Begin process of collecting
data from Ottawa and other municipalities and compare with
other cities
|
|
Time estimate:
|
Long term
|
|
Milestones:
|
Form subcommittee with non-OFAC members for assistance;
Contact former Nepean, Gloucester, Ottawa, Kanata etc Hydro
and Bell Canada personnel to obtain past costs of activities
listed under deliverables; Report to OFAC June 2003.
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
$50
|
| |
|
Activity name:
|
D10 Partner on Existing Projects |
|
Related activities:
|
B3, D3, D6
|
|
Specifications/deliverables:
|
Review of Petrie Island Protection and Management
Plan from perspective of forest values protection.
|
|
Time estimate:
|
Short term.
|
|
Milestones:
|
Quarterly report.
|
|
Cost estimate:
|
Nil
|
Total
Budget Request for 2002-2003 $8,825
|